Documents to download

The Armed Forces Deployment (Royal Prerogative) Bill is a private member’s bill introduced by Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Liberal Democrat).  The Bill received its first reading in the House of Lords on 24 May 2016 and is scheduled to have its second reading on 8 July 2016.

The Bill would require the Prime Minister to seek approval from the House of Commons before taking a ‘conflict decision’ authorising the use of force by UK forces, if the use of force would take place outside the United Kingdom and would be regulated by the law of armed conflict. The Prime Minister would have to seek such approval by laying a report before the House of Commons setting out the terms of the proposed approval. The House of Commons could seek the opinion of the House of Lords, but it would be for the House of Commons to resolve whether or not to approve the proposed conflict decision. The Prime Minister would not be required to seek approval for a conflict decision if:

  • There was not sufficient time (the ‘emergency condition’).
  • Public disclosure of information about the conflict decision could prejudice the effectiveness of military activities and/or the security or safety of members of UK forces or other forces or people assisting them (the ‘security condition’).
  • The conflict decision covered only: members of special forces and/or members of UK forces for the purposes of assisting special forces’ activities.

The power to deploy armed forces is a prerogative power exercised on the Sovereign’s behalf by Ministers. In 2011, the Coalition Government announced its intention to “enshrine in law for the future the necessity of consulting Parliament on military action”. However, in April 2016, Michael Fallon, the Secretary of State for Defence announced that the Government had decided not to legislate on this matter, to avoid constraining the operational flexibility of the armed forces. He noted that the Government had demonstrated its commitment to the convention by holding debates on military action and respecting the will of Parliament on each occasion.

Related Links

Documents to download

Related posts

  • National Security (State Threats) Bill: HL Bill 35 of 2026–27

    The National Security (State Threats) Bill would create new powers for the home secretary to designate bodies engaged in state threat activity, equivalent to the proscription of terrorist organisations under the Terrorism Act 2000. The bill would create three new offences associated with designation of supporting, assisting, or receiving material benefit from a designated body. These offences would carry sentences of up to 14 years’ imprisonment.

    National Security (State Threats) Bill: HL Bill 35 of 2026–27

  • Threats to UK democracy: Disinformation, foreign interference and declining public trust

    Social media and other technologies have made it easier, quicker and cheaper for foreign powers to spread false information online aimed at undermining UK democracy. Such disinformation campaigns are one type of interference operation. In parallel, researchers have noted a link between declining public trust and societal polarisation, which can be exacerbated by online discourse. This briefing provides introductory reading to these issues, including recent reports and government announcements.

    Threats to UK democracy: Disinformation, foreign interference and declining public trust

  • Recommendations of the Jo Cox Civility Commission

    Concerns about abuse and intimidation towards elected representatives have increased in recent years. The Jo Cox Civility Commission made a number of recommendations in a 2024 report to address this because of concerns that this activity would dissuade people from standing in elections and encourage existing representatives to stand down. The government has instigated a number of policies to tackle the abuse and intimidation of elected representatives.

    Recommendations of the Jo Cox Civility Commission