Documents to download

In England, there is currently no cap on the level of fees that lettings agents or landlords can charge to tenants. The Tenant Fees Bill would ban letting fees and the majority of other upfront fees payable by tenants to rent a property. It would also cap the amount of refundable security deposit a tenant would be required to pay to the value of six weeks’ rent and cap the amount of holding deposit a tenant could be required to put down to secure a property to the value of one week’s rent.

The Bill would place a duty on trading standards authorities to enforce these measures (and enable district councils which are not trading standards authorities to do so) and would impose new penalties on any landlord or letting agent found to be in contravention of them. These include a fine of £5,000 for a first breach, which would typically be viewed as a civil offence. A further breach within five years, however, would be viewed as a criminal offence, and subject to an unlimited fine and a banning order offence under the Housing and Planning Act 2016. Ministers have stated the Government will provide £500,000 in additional funding during the first year after the provisions come into force to support enforcement activities in recognition of the additional costs they will generate but expects the regime to be self-financing over the long-term.

A number of consumer groups and charities such as Citizens Advice and Shelter have declared their support for the Bill. However, organisations representing landlords and letting agencies have raised concerns that the abolition of fees will result in rising rent levels. The Bill secured cross-party support during its passage through the House of Commons, with Labour and the Liberal Democrats speaking in favour of the legislation. However, concerns were also raised, including about: whether the cap on security deposit was too high; the treatment of holding deposits; would trading enforcement bodies lack sufficient resource to police the ban effectively; and whether the Bill was overly reliant on guidance and created loopholes which unscrupulous landlords and letting agents might be able to exploit.

The Bill was not amended during committee stage in the House of Commons, but the Government tabled a series of amendments at report stage in response to these concerns. All were added to the Bill without division, and though opposition amendments were tabled at committee and report stage, none were successful. Third reading was given to the Bill in the House of Commons on 5 September, and it is due to have its second reading in the House of Lords on 10 October 2018.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Leaseholder Remediation (Building Safety) Bill [HL]: HL Bill 18 of 2026–27

    The Leaseholder Remediation (Building Safety) Bill [HL] is a private member’s bill that would prevent developers and building owners from recovering remediation costs for systemic defects from protected leaseholders in residential buildings containing any leasehold properties, with no minimum height or storey threshold. Systemic defects would include unsafe cladding and structural deficiencies. The House of Lords is scheduled to debate the bill at second reading on 11 September 2026.

    Leaseholder Remediation (Building Safety) Bill [HL]: HL Bill 18 of 2026–27
  • Rights of Boat Dwellers Bill [HL]: HL Bill 16 of 2026–27

    The Rights of Boat Dwellers Bill [HL] would establish a right to access public services for boat dwellers and prevent relevant authorities from taking certain actions­—such as eviction proceedings—that might infringe on the right to a secure home or the right to access public services.

    Rights of Boat Dwellers Bill [HL]: HL Bill 16 of 2026–27
  • Building Safety Regulator: Lords Industry and Regulators Committee report

    In December 2025, the House of Lords Industry and Regulators Committee published its report ‘The Building Safety Regulator: Building a better regulator’. The committee found that delays caused by the regulator’s approval processes had delayed or disincentivised refurbishments, safety upgrades and the remediation of dangerous cladding in high-rise buildings. It made recommendations aimed at these addressing the issues. The government accepted the intent of the recommendations and set out information on how it would take them forward.

    Building Safety Regulator: Lords Industry and Regulators Committee report