Documents to download

Online political advertising has grown dramatically since 2011. In 2017, campaigners in the UK spent nearly half (43%) of their total advertising budget on online advertising, compared to less than 1% (0.35%) of their total advertising budget in 2011.

Campaigners, such as the Electoral Reform Society, have argued that there is “a near-total lack of regulation of online political advertising” and have called for legislative reform. The debate around political advertising generally falls within three categories:

  • factchecking;
  • microtargeting; and
  • disclosure of the source of adverts.

In 2018 and 2019, both the Electoral Commission and the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee investigated the increased use of digital campaigns. Their reports gave recommendations on legislative changes that could be implemented, including the possible introduction of an imprint requirement for digital adverts. This would give information such as the name of the person or the group that paid for it. They also flagged up areas that they did not believe needed changing, such as the introduction of legal requirements to factcheck claims made in political adverts.

Following allegations of widespread misuse of users’ data in the UK and US elections in 2016, some social media platforms voluntarily updated their policies on political advertising. In October 2019, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that the platform would no longer allow political adverts on its site. In addition, Facebook and Google made changes to the way political advertisers could engage with voters.

In May 2019, the Government committed to implementing an imprint requirement for digital adverts. This was not introduced before the December election. The Government has since reaffirmed its commitment to extending regulations covering the identification of campaigners offline to the online sphere. It also has pledged to “launch a consultation on electoral integrity that will consider measures to […] refresh our laws for the digital age”.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Threats to UK democracy: Disinformation, foreign interference and declining public trust

    Social media and other technologies have made it easier, quicker and cheaper for foreign powers to spread false information online aimed at undermining UK democracy. Such disinformation campaigns are one type of interference operation. In parallel, researchers have noted a link between declining public trust and societal polarisation, which can be exacerbated by online discourse. This briefing provides introductory reading to these issues, including recent reports and government announcements.

    Threats to UK democracy: Disinformation, foreign interference and declining public trust
  • Recommendations of the Jo Cox Civility Commission

    Concerns about abuse and intimidation towards elected representatives have increased in recent years. The Jo Cox Civility Commission made a number of recommendations in a 2024 report to address this because of concerns that this activity would dissuade people from standing in elections and encourage existing representatives to stand down. The government has instigated a number of policies to tackle the abuse and intimidation of elected representatives.

    Recommendations of the Jo Cox Civility Commission
  • Sporting Events Bill [HL]: HL Bill 3 of 2026–27

    The second reading of the Sporting Events Bill [HL] is due to take place in the House of Lords on 3 June 2026. The bill would establish a common legislative framework that could be applied to major sporting events in the UK. It would cover ticket touting, advertising and trading, unauthorised association and transport.

    Sporting Events Bill [HL]: HL Bill 3 of 2026–27