Documents to download

Over the twelve months prior July 2015, a number of reports have been published into the use of investigatory powers by public agencies in the UK. Those reports include:

• David Anderson QC, the Government’s Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, A Question of Trust: Report of the Investigatory Powers Review, June 2015

• The Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament, Privacy and Security: A Modern and Transparent Legal Framework, March 2015

• The Annual Report of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner, September 2014

• The Annual Report of the Intelligence Services Commissioner, June 2015

• The Report by the Prime Minister’s Special Envoy on Intelligence and Law Enforcement Data Sharing, Sir  Nigel Sheinwald, June 2015

During a House of Commons debate on these reports on 25 June 2015, the Home Secretary, Theresa May, said that taken together they constitute a “substantial Independent Review” on the use of investigatory powers and the arrangements for their oversight. Although the reports differ in some of their conclusions, both the Government’s Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation and the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament have recommended for the overhaul of the current legislative framework for the use of investigatory powers and the replacement of legislation such as the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.

The introduction of new legislation on communications data was a commitment in the 2015 Conservative Manifesto. The Manifesto also stated that in government the Conservatives would seek to “maintain the ability of the authorities to intercept the content of suspects’ communications, while continuing to strengthen oversight of the use of these powers”. The Government has committed to introducing a bill on investigatory powers in the early part of 2016. To this end, the Government has stated that a draft bill would be presented for pre-legislative scrutiny in the autumn of 2015.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill: HL Bill 32 of 2026–27

    The Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill is a government bill intended to strengthen the cyber security of organisations in the UK that provide essential services, such as healthcare, drinking water and energy. It would amend the Network and Information Systems (NIS) Regulations 2018 to include additional sectors and update incident reporting duties. It would also confer powers on the secretary of state to amend the legislation and issue directions to organisations when necessary for national security. The bill is scheduled for its second reading in the House of Lords on 14 July 2026.

    Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill: HL Bill 32 of 2026–27
  • National Security (State Threats) Bill: HL Bill 35 of 2026–27

    The National Security (State Threats) Bill would create new powers for the home secretary to designate bodies engaged in state threat activity, equivalent to the proscription of terrorist organisations under the Terrorism Act 2000. The bill would create three new offences associated with designation of supporting, assisting, or receiving material benefit from a designated body. These offences would carry sentences of up to 14 years’ imprisonment.

    National Security (State Threats) Bill: HL Bill 35 of 2026–27
  • Threats to UK democracy: Disinformation, foreign interference and declining public trust

    Social media and other technologies have made it easier, quicker and cheaper for foreign powers to spread false information online aimed at undermining UK democracy. Such disinformation campaigns are one type of interference operation. In parallel, researchers have noted a link between declining public trust and societal polarisation, which can be exacerbated by online discourse. This briefing provides introductory reading to these issues, including recent reports and government announcements.

    Threats to UK democracy: Disinformation, foreign interference and declining public trust