This House of Lords Library briefing has been prepared in advance of the debate on the impact of Universal Credit on claimants in the House of Lords on 16 November 2017.
Impact of Universal Credit on Claimants (361 KB , PDF)
On 16 November 2017, the House of Lords is due to debate a motion moved by Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) that “that this House takes note of the impact of Universal Credit on claimants”.
The Government is currently rolling out Universal Credit (UC). UC is a significant reform of the way in which social security payments are delivered. It is intended to replace the following forms of welfare with one single payment: working tax credit; child tax credit; income based jobseeker’s allowance; income support; income related employment and support allowance; and housing benefits.
The timetable for the roll-out of UC has undergone a series of changes. The Coalition Government had originally intended to complete the roll-out of UC to all claimants by 2017–18. However, difficulties with the system were identified during the process of establishing pilot schemes in 2013. The handling of this initial roll-out was subsequently criticised by the National Audit Office. As a result, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) changed its implementation plans, instead rolling out UC on a limited basis, primarily targeting claimants of jobseeker’s allowance. The roll-out of the final version of UC to individual jobcentres began in 2016, at a rate of five jobcentres per month. The Government intends to complete the process by 2022.
The Government has argued that UC has so far been successful, pointing to an assessment that showed UC claimants are 3 percent more likely to go into employment than jobseeker’s allowance claimants. It has used this as justification for the increase in the rate of the roll-out taking place over the course of 2017 and 2018. The Opposition has stated its support for the principle that the social security system ought to be simplified. However, it has criticised the way UC has been designed and rolled out. It has also argued that the Government has used UC as a means of cutting spending on welfare.
Both the Opposition and the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee have also criticised the length of time that new claimants must wait for their first UC payment, arguing that this is leading claimants into poverty and unable to pay for their accommodation. However, the Government has argued measures that it has put in place, including the option for claimants to receive an advance payment, are sufficient to mitigate the impact of this waiting period.
Impact of Universal Credit on Claimants (361 KB , PDF)
The Veterans Advisory and Pensions Committees Bill is intended to widen the statutory functions of the committees to better represent how they have operated in recent years. The bill passed all of its Commons stages unamended with cross-party support.
The Supported Housing (Regulatory Oversight) Bill is a private member’s bill that has government support. The purpose of the bill is to improve the regulation and oversight of ‘supported exempt’ housing, which is exempt from the benefit cap and housing benefit limits in welfare regulations. The bill has been introduced in response to reports of poor quality provision in the exempt housing sector.
The Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Bill is a private member’s bill sponsored by Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour). The bill would amend the Employment Rights Act 1996 to make it easier for employees to request flexible working. It was first introduced in the House of Commons and received cross-party support. The bill passed all its stages in the House of Commons without being amended.
