Documents to download

On 7 June 2018, the House of Lords is scheduled to debate a motion moved by Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat) on the “report of the Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, An Inspection of the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme”.

On 8 May 2018, the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI) published a report entitled An Inspection of the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme. In it, David Bolt, the Chief Inspector, broadly praised the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPRS) as “essentially effective”. However, Mr Bolt caveated his praise for the scheme by cautioning that the Home Office, which acts as a cross-government lead for the VPRS, “could do more to analyse and evaluate the various stages of the resettlement process, with a view to sharing ‘best practice’ and achieving greater consistency of treatment and outcomes”. In addition, Mr Bolt argued that there could be lessons to learn from an assessment of whether resettled refugees had successfully integrated, with any lessons potentially benefitting those still in the early stages of the resettlement process. Finally, Mr Bolt urged the Home Office to be aware of how its processes affected others, including partner bodies of the scheme.

The ICIBI report made seven recommendations in respect of the VPRS. Two of these, regarding use of refugees’ pre-departure time and mechanisms to remove policy misalignments across government, were accepted in full by the Government. The remaining five were partially accepted. These regarded staffing, data, ‘best practice’ and guidance, closer contact with local authorities, and communications. Mr Bolt has described the Government’s response as “disappointing”, arguing that it committed the Government to few, if any, actions, and disputed or rejected several of the report’s findings. As a result, Mr Bolt alleged that the Government appeared “closed to the idea that there is any room for improvement” in how the scheme was managed and operated.

This House of Lords Library Briefing provides background information on the VPRS. It then considers commentary on the report, before summarising the report’s seven recommendations and accompanying government responses. The Briefing concludes with a selection of recommended further reading.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • British Sovereignty Protection (Chagos Islands) Bill [HL]: HL Bill 15 of 2026–27

    The British Sovereignty Protection (Chagos Islands) Bill [HL] is a private member’s bill sponsored by Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party). The bill would restrict any cession or transfer of sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) unless certain requirements were met, including the consent of the Chagossian people and an act of parliament. It would also see the UK remain sovereign over the military base on Diego Garcia.

    British Sovereignty Protection (Chagos Islands) Bill [HL]: HL Bill 15 of 2026–27
  • Sovereign Grant Bill: HL Bill 54 of 2026–27

    The Sovereign Grant Bill is a government bill which would amend how the sovereign grant is set. This is a grant paid to the King to support the work of the sovereign. The bill would enable the size of the sovereign grant to be reduced following the completion of a 10-year works project on Buckingham Palace. The bill received cross-party support and was not amended in the House of Commons.

    Sovereign Grant Bill: HL Bill 54 of 2026–27
  • Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL]: Progress in the Lords

    The Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] is a wide-ranging bill that aims to reform the way the UK financial services sector is regulated. This briefing provides a summary of the bill’s second reading and committee stage in the House of Lords ahead of its further consideration at report.

    Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL]: Progress in the Lords