Universal credit (UC), introduced in 2013, currently restricts the payment of additional child elements to the first two children in a household, if the third or subsequent children were born after April 2017. Some exceptions apply, for example for multiple births or for children born through non-consensual conception. The policy was introduced by the Conservative government in the July 2015 budget. The government said the policy was intended to reduce the welfare budget and to be fair to “working families who don’t see their budgets rise when they have more children”. In 2015, the government estimated that the policy would save £1.4bn a year by 2020/21. 

As the two-child limit only applies to children born after April 2017, not all households on UC are affected by the policy. As of April 2021, there were 836,000 households with three or more children claiming either UC or child tax credit (which UC is replacing). Of those, 318,000 households, containing around 1.1 million children, were affected by the two-child limit. 

The two-child limit has been controversial since it was announced. Critics argue that it has contributed to an increase in child poverty and that it disproportionately affects certain communities, in particular some religious groups and ethnic minorities. 

In 2019, a House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee report recommended that the two-child limit be abolished. It challenged the assumptions which underpinned the government’s objectives for the policy, and it found no evidence that the two-child limit had encouraged parents of larger families to work more hours.

In recent months, academic studies of poverty in larger families and of the effect of the two-child limit on fertility rates have been published. Their findings suggested that:

  • Almost all the increase in child poverty in the UK since 2012/13 was driven by poverty in households with three or more children and changes to social security benefits were the biggest contributor to the increase in poverty.
  • Fertility rates in households impacted by the two-child limit have not decreased significantly.

Opposition parties are opposed to the two-child limit. The 2019 general election manifestoes of both the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats committed to abolishing the policy. The current government has defended the policy as “sustainable and fair” to claimants and taxpayers.


Related posts

  • Commercial Payments Bill [HL]: Progress in the Lords

    The Commercial Payments Bill [HL] seeks to tackle late payments to small businesses. It would impose minimum payment periods for invoices, prohibit the use of retentions in construction contracts and provide the small business commissioner with greater powers. The bill received an unopposed second reading in the House of Lords on 9 June 2026. 30 government amendments were made to the bill at committee stage.

    Commercial Payments Bill [HL]: Progress in the Lords
  • Cohabitation Rights Bill [HL]: HL Bill 14 of 2026–27

    The Cohabitation Rights Bill [HL] is a private member’s bill introduced by Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat). The bill would provide certain protections for cohabiting couples, for example in the event one of them dies. Its second reading is scheduled for 17 July 2026.

    Cohabitation Rights Bill [HL]: HL Bill 14 of 2026–27
  • Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill: HL Bill 22 of 2026–27

    The Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill is a government bill that would provide powers to nationalise a company involved in steel manufacturing where it is in the public interest. It completed its House of Commons stages on 9 June 2026 and is scheduled for second reading in the House of Lords on 16 June 2026. The government has explained the bill is being fast-tracked as it believes it is necessary to safeguard the future of the UK steel industry. It says this is important for the UK economy, national security and critical infrastructure.

    Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill: HL Bill 22 of 2026–27