The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill would amend existing data protection legislation in ways the government says would reduce burdens on organisations while maintaining high data protection standards. 

Among other things, the bill would also reform the governance structure and powers of the information commissioner. It would clarify rules on international data transfers, allowing the secretary of state to approve ‘data bridges’ with other countries. It would establish a regulatory framework for digital verification services providers. It would enable the government to require data holders to share customer data at the customer’s request to enable smart data schemes. It would enable law enforcement authorities to retain biometric data obtained from foreign partners for longer. It would allow Ofcom to require social media companies to retain information in connection with an investigation by a coroner into the death of a child who was suspected to have died by suicide. It would establish electronic, rather than paper-based, registers of births and deaths. It would also establish a national underground asset register. It would abolish the biometrics commissioner and surveillance camera commissioner, transferring some of their functions to other regulators. 

Hundreds of government amendments were made to the bill in the House of Commons. Labour argued at report stage that the bill should be recommitted to a public bill committee to allow further scrutiny, but this motion was defeated. Labour welcomed a government amendment at report stage removing the secretary of state’s power to veto codes of conduct drawn up by the information commissioner. MPs raised concerns about new provisions added at report stage to enable the government to require banks and financial institutions to provide data about accounts linked to benefit claimants, which the government argues is necessary to tackle benefit fraud. MPs questioned why state pension claimants were included. They also raised concerns about the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) having powers to look at people’s bank accounts without grounds for suspicion. The provisions were added to the bill after a division. Non-government amendments on democratic engagement, high-risk processing of data and safeguards on automated decision-making were defeated at report stage.


Related posts

  • British Sovereignty Protection (Chagos Islands) Bill [HL]: HL Bill 15 of 2026–27

    The British Sovereignty Protection (Chagos Islands) Bill [HL] is a private member’s bill sponsored by Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party). The bill would restrict any cession or transfer of sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) unless certain requirements were met, including the consent of the Chagossian people and an act of parliament. It would also see the UK remain sovereign over the military base on Diego Garcia.

    British Sovereignty Protection (Chagos Islands) Bill [HL]: HL Bill 15 of 2026–27
  • Health Bill: HL Bill 52 of 2026–27

    The Health Bill is intended to make changes to the NHS in England, including abolishing NHS England. It would also abolish Healthwatch and move the Heath Services Safety Inspectorate Board into the CQC. The bill would establish a single patient record, making patient data available across healthcare settings and directly to patients. In the House of Commons, amendments were made on visiting patients, medicines and medical devices regulation, and pharmaceutical services.

    Health Bill: HL Bill 52 of 2026–27
  • Sovereign Grant Bill: HL Bill 54 of 2026–27

    The Sovereign Grant Bill is a government bill which would amend how the sovereign grant is set. This is a grant paid to the King to support the work of the sovereign. The bill would enable the size of the sovereign grant to be reduced following the completion of a 10-year works project on Buckingham Palace. The bill received cross-party support and was not amended in the House of Commons.

    Sovereign Grant Bill: HL Bill 54 of 2026–27